Why I prefer human-readable file formats

2025-08-04 19:50

When I say human-readable file format, I'm referring to text-based files that can be opened, read, and understood without the need for any specific software or proprietary interface. They include formats like Markdown, JSON, YAML, INI, TOML, CSV/TSV and even fixed-width text files where the content and its structure are visible, transparent, and editable in a simple text editor. Unlike binary formats or database dumps, these files don't hide their meaning behind layers of abstraction. They're built for clarity, for resilience, and for people who like to know what's going on under the hood.

Readability without specialized tools

The most immediate advantage is the freedom from software dependencies. With human-readable formats, you're never locked out of your own data. Whether you're on a fresh Linux installation, a locked-down corporate machine, or troubleshooting a system with minimal tools, you can always inspect your configuration files, data exports, or documentation with nothing more than cat, less, or any basic text editor.

This accessibility extends beyond emergency situations. When you're working across different environments, platforms, or with team members who might not have the Same specialized software installed, human-readable formats eliminate friction. A JSON configuration file works the same way whether you're viewing it in VS Code, vim, or even a web browser. This universality means fewer barriers to collaboration and fewer "it works on my machine" moments.

Longevity and future-proofing

Digital archaeology is real, and proprietary formats are its enemy. How many documents from the 1990s are now trapped in obsolete file formats? Human-readable formats, built on open standards and simple text encoding, have remarkable staying power. A CSV file from 1985 is still perfectly readable today, while many proprietary database formats from the same era require archaeological efforts to decode. Ok, sometimes, there are some character encoding conversions needed (you see, CP-1252, EBCDIC, IBM-850, ISO8859-15, UTF-8), but, these operations are easy nowadays.

This longevity isn't just about the distant future, it's about practical resilience over years and decades. When software vendors pivot, get acquired, or simply discontinue products, human-readable formats remain accessible. Your data doesn't become hostage to a company's business decisions or technical roadmap. Text-based formats have survived multiple generations of computing paradigms because they're built on fundamental, stable foundations.

Auditability and manual correction

Transparency breeds trust, and human-readable formats offer complete transparency. When something goes wrong, and it always does eventually, you can actually see what's happening. Error messages become meaningful when you can examine the problematic line in a YAML file or spot the malformed JSON that's breaking your application.

This visibility enables surgical corrections. Instead of having to reload an entire database or regenerate a complex binary file, you can make precise edits with confidence. Found a typo in a configuration value? Fix it directly. Need to bulk-update settings? Write a simple script or use standard text processing tools. The ability to manually intervene when automated processes fail is invaluable for maintaining systems and debugging problems.

Autonomy and simple tooling

Human-readable formats democratize data manipulation. You don't need expensive software licenses, proprietary APIs, or vendor-specific tools to work with your data. The entire Unix toolchain, grep, sed, awk, sort, cut, becomes your toolkit. Want to extract all email addresses from a CSV? grep has you covered. Need to merge configuration files? vimdiff or meld will help you.

This approach fosters self-reliance and skill transferability. The techniques you learn for processing one human-readable format often apply to others. Regular expressions, text processing patterns, and command-line tools form a versatile foundation that remains useful across different domains and technologies. You're building durable skills rather than learning vendor-specific interfaces.

Open standards and libre ecosystem

Human-readable formats typically emerge from open standards processes and are supported by vibrant libre software ecosystems. JSON, XML, CSV, these formats have multiple independent implementations, comprehensive specifications, and broad community support. This diversity prevents any single entity from controlling your data's destiny.

The libre ecosystem around these formats is rich and mature. Parsers, validators, converters, and processors exist in every programming language. Documentation is abundant, examples are everywhere, and the knowledge is freely shared. This ecosystem effect means that investing in human-readable formats connects you to a vast network of tools, libraries, and community knowledge.

Git-friendly version control

Version control systems like Git are optimized for text, and human-readable formats take full advantage of this optimization. Line-by-line diffs become meaningful, showing exactly what changed between versions. Merge conflicts are resolvable because you can actually read and understand the conflicting content.

This compatibility transforms how you manage configuration, documentation, and data evolution. Every change becomes traceable, every modification can be reviewed, and rolling back becomes surgical rather than destructive. When your entire project, code, configuration, documentation, and data, can be versioned together coherently, you gain unprecedented visibility into your system's evolution.

Efficiency and low resource usage

Human-readable doesn't mean inefficient. Text-based formats are often surprisingly compact, especially when compressed. They parse quickly, require minimal memory overhead, and can be streamed and processed incrementally. A well-structured JSON file can be more efficient than a complex binary format with similar information density.

The tooling ecosystem around human-readable formats is also lightweight and efficient. Command-line processors like jq for JSON or standard Unix tools can handle massive files with minimal resource consumption. This efficiency extends to development workflows, quick inspection, rapid iteration, and lightweight processing make human-readable formats ideal for agile development and rapid prototyping.

Choosing human-readable file formats is an act of technological sovereignty. It's about maintaining control over your data, ensuring long-term accessibility, and building systems that remain comprehensible and maintainable over time. The slight overhead of human readability pays dividends in flexibility, durability, and peace of mind.

These formats also represent a philosophy: that technology should serve human understanding rather than obscure it. In choosing transparency over convenience, we build more resilient, more maintainable, and ultimately more trustworthy systems.

Your point-of-view is welcome on the Fediverse